🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear he could survive a loss to lower-league opposition. Survive a decisive European final versus one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He withstood home defeats to domestic rivals, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, squandering some of the club’s best academy products, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the poorest the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent with whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to engage. You come at Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership right-back in Blackburn’s title-winning 1994-95 season, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and appears to have failed. Even the most casual observer can see the irony here: a coach who frequently berated his squad for losing individual battles crumbling when confronted by the intense pressure and animal charisma of a England's top division's most feared football executives.

And frankly, this whole bruising episode appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. It may have been easy, given his brief stint in a similar role at Southampton, to regard Jason Wilcox as merely a drudge within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due as much to his close relationship with ex-colleague a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. By masterfully outmanoeuvring United’s feted manager, just as he bested the hapless Dan Ashworth before him, he has proved himself to be among football's strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect of which United’s competitors are now rightly wary.

A Tactical Conflict Regarding System & Philosophy

For example, it was the director , after having been part of the leadership that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, was instrumental in trying to persuade Amorim to abandon his beloved formation. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties met a certain resistance. However, such directives hold greater authority when issued from the mouth with the unimpeachable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to explain his thought processes to the rest of us. Maybe one day he might be asked regarding why the coach is walking away with full compensation, with no compensation reduction clause activated. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers in football – men like him – function on a plane exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely all we would hear is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite equivalent to being ready to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Power Behind Command

Naturally, in training our focus on the sporting director we overlook the real power behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, merely executing the directives of his ultimate line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has made very clear his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, the owner has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for United to embrace data science and metrics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting soon after his minority ownership, he announced that United’s style of play “will be determined in this room”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, drawing from his previous experience in industry and sailing. Most importantly he remains incredibly rich, and as we all know, the wealthy are superior: more perceptive, more wise, more tactically astute, simply superior. Who else would you trust to manage a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the building of a new stadium that looks similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

A New Soccer Hierarchy: Executives Over Managers

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels of the game. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, talent spotters – players themselves. Perhaps it was once feasible for a young, innovative manager with a philosophy and drive to go into a club and see their vision supported to fruition. But how many companies have these guys established? How many mass redundancies have they overseen? Far preferable to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the guys with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the tactics in the boardroom and hire someone who can tailor their methods accordingly. If coaches were once chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not creating the food, yet finally accountable if it arrives poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly not about defining the vision and more about selling it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the visible figurehead of an organisation they have minimal power to change. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of very young players into Europe and secures two medium-sized trophies, and essentially is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his standing damaged whereas those individuals who hired him continue to make errors another day.

The Modern Corporate Football: Responsibility Only for the Few

And perhaps in a small way this is simply corporate governance at work: the rise of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose choices are always untouchable, whose errors can invariably be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach and then dismiss them for playing too much that system. Hire the process guy and then discard him for requiring excessive time. And most importantly show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for your new player acquisitions, for the fact that the grownups – however well qualified – are in charge.